Why Can't We Just Give Them a Beer? (Tales from the CCU)
added by geena on May 7, 2008 at 1:50 PM
This weekend we had a patient who had come in with chest pain. He was taken to the cath lab and was stented.
Normally this kind of patient would go home in a day or two if there were no complications. Unfortunately this patient had a big complication - he was an alcoholic. So by the time he was ready for discharge for his heart problem, his alcohol withdrawal had kicked in.
He is now on day 5 of his stay at the hospital. He spent at least 4 of those days in ICU which costs many thousands of dollars a day. He was still there Sunday afternoon when I left, and still on his Ativan drip. He was nowhere near getting transferred out to the floor.
I'll cheerfully bet you $100 that even after all of the hell his body went through detoxifying from alcohol, he will get some good 'ol ETOH from somewhere within an hour of leaving the hospital. You see, when he started getting goofy from DT's, we started drugging him. Probably with some oral Valium at first, then when that didn't work, we hit him with some continuous intravenous Ativan. Once the worst of the DT's passes, we wean him off IV Ativan back onto oral Valium. When he's stable on that, he gets discharged. I admit that I don't know exactly how that works, because we just transfer them to the floors. Does he get sent home? Does he go to some alcohol treatment center? I have no idea.
I do know that some of our detox patients are in ICU because they have presented to the ER for whatever reason and request to be detoxed. They've had enough; they want off the sauce. Even the relapse rate for this is high; I often see the same patients come back over and over again. And those patients want to detox.
But when alcoholics come in for other health problems, they are detoxed whether they want to be or not. It's for staff and patient safety, you know. People going through DT's can be very combative and can be dangerous to themselves and others. So if they don't get out of the hospital before the shakes hit, they automatically buy themselves a week's stay... or longer.
This practice is downright counterproductive. If the patient comes in with a health problem, they should be assessed (as they currently are) for their alcohol intake. If it seems that the patient is an alcoholic, they should be counseled about it ("you should really stop drinking, you know") and then be allowed to make their own decision. If they choose to keep drinking, they should be allowed to drink in the hospital. I know there are all kinds of possible ramifications to this idea, and I'm not talking about letting patients get sloshed. But if a beer or three a day will keep the DT's at bay, then they get a shorter hospital stay. Which would taxpayers rather pay for? A case of beer or a $40,000 hospital bill?
Obviously it would not be a good idea for everyone, but I believe that it would be very helpful for some. I can't tell you how many patients I've seen who come in for some minor surgery (appendectomy, chole, etc) and end up with all kinds of complications because we decide that they need IV Ativan more than they need a glass of wine or three at dinner.
They're adults. It is utterly ridiculous how we healthcare providers think we should fix every little thing about a patient when all they need is a stent and a bus ticket back home.



